| |
UT1HZM > SYSOP 27.01.20 10:05z 31 Lines 836 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 58298_UT1HZM
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: IR2UFV on behalf IW2OHX
Path: HB9ON<IW2OHX<IR1UAW<I0OJJ<I0OJJ<EA2RCF<ZL2BAU<LU4ECL<F4DUR<CX2SA<
OK2PEN<OK0PBR<UT1HZM
Sent: 200127/0736Z 58298@UT1HZM.KREM.POL.UKR.EU BPQ6.0.19
>From ut1hzm%ut1hzm.krem.pol.ukr.eu@i0ojj.ampr.org Mon Jan 27 11:05:03 2020
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m.1) with SMTP
id AA97494 ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:05:03 +0100
Message-Id: <58298_UT1HZM@ir0rm.bbs>
>From: ut1hzm@ut1hzm.krem.pol.ukr.eu
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (ir0rm @ 44.134.32.240) -> Sending message
Hello, Gus
>Unfortunately that is one of unnecessary features
>implemented on BPQ PMS... that notifications can be
>received also for unread sysop mail, and also for
>some kinda bulletins...
>
>--
>73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
This is not unnecessary features,
more looks like some mis-configured Forward config at IR2UFV BBS,
that caused to sent those Notification messages out of the dedicated BBS.
Actually it should not go anywhere, just to p-mail of sysop.
73, Sergej.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
